“Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. However, the effective treatment for breast cancer progression is still being sought.
The activation of cannabinoid receptor (CB) has been shown to negatively affect breast cancer cell survival.
Our previous study also reported that breast cancer cells responded to various combinations of CB1 and CB2 agonists differently. Nonetheless, the mechanism underlying this effect and whether this phenomenon can be seen in other cancer characteristics remain unknown. Therefore, this study aims to further elucidate the effects of highly selective CB agonists and their combination on triple-negative breast cancer proliferation, cell cycle progression, invasion, lamellipodia formation as well as proteomic profile of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.
The presence of CB agonists, specifically a 2:1 (ACEA: GW405833) combination, prominently inhibited colony formation and induced the S-phase cell cycle arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, cell invasion ability and lamellipodia formation of MDA-MB-231 were also attenuated by the exposure of CB agonists and their 2:1 combination ratio. Our proteomic analysis revealed proteomic profile alteration in MDA-MB-231 upon CB exposure that potentially led to breast cancer suppression, such as ZPR1/SHC1/MAPK-mediated cell proliferation and AXL/VAV2/RAC1-mediated cell motility pathways.
Our findings showed that selective CB agonists and their combination suppressed breast cancer characteristics in MDA-MB-231 cells. The exposure of CB agonists also altered the proteomic profile of MDA-MB-231, which could lead to cell proliferation and motility suppression.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39527598/
“Our study demonstrated that the presence of CB agonists hindered breast cancer cell growth, cell cycle progression, invasion through extracellular matrices and lamellipodia formation. The exposure of specific combination of CB1 and CB2 agonists also enhanced their breast cancer suppression effects. Moreover, breast cancer survival and motility-related proteins affected by the presence of these agonists suggesting the potential pathways underlying their effects were also depicted in this study.”
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312851